It’s easy to keep up with trends nowadays. All it takes is one look at those dependable people around you that think that they’re being alternative and unique, but in reality they are just following whatever trend that they think people will think is alternative and unique. Those people who give out about stereotypes all day long but then do everything they can to ensure they match that stereotype down to a tee. The wannabe emo’s who suddenly turned hipster when Skrillex became a thing and when My Chemical Romance stopped being depressing enough for their taste. Those people. They’re really annoying, because they preach individuality all day long but what they don’t realise is that they’re all carbon copies of each other. They’re all the same.
Disclaimer: It’s kind of depressing that I have to clarify these things really but hey, that’s life. This post has been misconstrued by some people as being about a specific real person. It is a rant about how hipsters in general annoy the fuck out of me. The only thing I see that may have been misinterpreted is the fact that the two examples I used with the music are associated with the real life person. Those examples are interchangeable, they were just the first two that came to mind. MCR aren’t even an emo band, but when you think of emo’s as a stereotype, they are the first band to come to mind and so I used them (even though I like MCR, especially their newer, definitely not any way at all emo, stuff). When I think of hipsters, the first person I think of is the Skrillex guy. You know, stereotypical hipster glasses and the fact that, because he used to be in a rock band, he bridged the gap between rave and emo, and a lot of the emos became hipsters. It’s not a secret that I dislike the person whom this is supposedly about, and that’s probably where the accusations stemmed from, but this is not about them. If I ever do write a Tumblr post about them, which I can’t see why I would want to, I will make sure to tag them in it or something so all of this confusion can be avoided in future! Sorry to disappoint anybody that was looking for a fight, but this time you’re barking up the wrong tree.. =P
When a fact appears to be opposed to a long train of deductions, it invariably proves to be capable of bearing some other interpretation.
The patented Gentlemanly Escort Cube is a must for all unchaperoned Victorian ladies finding themselves in indelicate situations that might upset their fragile constitutions.
The Cube excels particularly in warding off the untoward advances of stray turrets and politely holding down buttons for her as she proceeds along her way.
The Aperture Institute of Natural Philosophy reminds you that the Cube does not initiate conversation, and certainly not if you have not yet been formally introduced.
I like to start my morning by going to creationist and atheist blogs and watch them try to argue their points. The way 70% of each side go about it is hilariously idiotic. Enjoy just a taste I found this morning.
Things this idiotic person forgot to account for:
1. The water cycle.
2. The fact that humans have not been around for all of those 3 billion years.
3. The fact that the population was not always this big.
As a creationist, does he not believe that life started with ‘Adam and Eve’? That’s 2 people, not 6 billion. So even if we accept his faith, and leave the religious arguments out of it, he is still hilariously wrong.
You’re right, Phil. Religious debates are hilarious, on both the atheists and the creationists part. =P
